Skip to main content

Is the Change the Project?


th (6)

(Large Government Agency) has begun one of the largest government IT projects in (Country).

(Large Government Agency) has a strong desire to move into the future, provide more efficient and user friendly systems with web and mobile interfaces, and move from 2nd generation code based systems (requiring over 150 maintenance programmers) to a 5th generation rules and workflow based system.

Unfortunately failure to upgrade their software environment and approach in the past left them with not only 2nd generation code and user interface (NATURAL by Software AG and 3270 green screens running in an IBM Mainframe environment) but with a 2nd generation architecture. The mixed screen & processing logic, pure mainframe batch processing model and narrowly specialized data model was judged unable to be extended for use as a transaction engine or even be service enabled. Certainly no part of a 3270 green screen 80x25 character based user interface can carry forward into a web model.

As a result (Large Government Agency) made the radical decision to THROW AWAY their complete existing application set and REBUILD THEIR FULL APPLICATION ENVIRONMENT. Project (Rebuild) at (Large Government Agency) is a 10 year project to replace each (Large Government Agency) business application set with a newly analyzed, architected, and developed application. The first application set is scheduled to go live in January, 2014, and will replace the Customer Data Management system, the (Main Business Process A) system, the Payment Processing System, and will create new systems for (previously non-automated high-personnel-overhead business process), Electronic Document Management (moving (Large Government Agency) from paper and file driven processes to fully electronic processes), and a new (customer submission process) Website.

The project involves over 120 consultants working in the (nice new) Technology Park in (major city) near the (Large Government Agency) headquarters but purposefully not in it. The project is not just creating new software but working on modernizing and streaming business processes, where possible given the complex laws, regulations, court decisions and labor union limitations.

Building a modern application from scratch, the project management has decided to go with a totally modern approach, meaning: True Service Oriented Architecture (not just web services, modular self-contained business step components), Rules Based (FICO Blaze rules engine), Event Driven, Workflow Process Controlled (Software AG Webmethods BPM engine), Java and IBM Websphere Application Server Java Enterprise Environment development environment, and DB/2 10 with a Hybrid-XML Data Model for complex yet easily adjustable data structures designed for fast reading of full data sets for rules processing.

~5% of the citizens of (country) interact with (Large Government Agency) on a regular basis. Today it takes an average of 142 days and 5 visits to (Large Government Agency) offices for those citizens to complete their interaction. This project will make the process both easier, faster and less expensive for (Large Government Agency) and for the citizens.

Of course, projects of this scope have great risks and a history of failure. A constant customer feedback process, agile development with independent modular deliverables attempts to minimize the risk. A rigorous testing, stress testing, and user testing schedule will further reduce the risk.

Yet, even with these project steps to reduce risk, an organization that has avoided any major systems or application changes in a human generation faces enormous cultural challenges in accepting such an upgrade. Cooperation between the business and IT has been focused around providing service (as a utility), not around explaining and automating processes. The IT infrastructure teams are used to managing equipment capacities several factors behind the current generation. Managing the cultural challenges within the organization and within the IT organization may be even higher risk than the large development scope of the project.

That said, (Large Government Agency) has hired teams of top tier consultants and given the project a realistic time frame and sufficient budget to make it happen. And perhaps most importantly, management has realistic expectations.

(Large Government Agency) has a reasonable likelihood of step by step success.  If dealing with change is difficult in most organizations, dealing with change IS the real project in this organization.

Popular posts from this blog

Integration Spaghetti™

  I’ve been using the term Integration Spaghetti™ for the past 9 years or so to describe what happens as systems connectivity increases and increases to the point of … unmanageability, indeterminate impact, or just generally a big mess.  A standard line of mine is “moving from spaghetti code to spaghetti connections is not an improvement”. (A standard “point to point connection mess” slide, by enterprise architect Jerry Foster from 2001.) In the past few days I’ve been meeting with a series of IT managers at a large customer and have come up with a revised definition for Integration Spaghetti™ : Integration Spaghetti™ is when the connectivity to/from an application is so complex that everyone is afraid of touching it.  An application with such spaghetti becomes nearly impossible to replace.  Estimates of change impact to the application are frequently wrong by orders of magnitude.  Interruption in the integration functioning are always a major disast...
Read more

Solving Integration Chaos - Past Approaches

A U.S. Fortune 50's systems interconnect map for 1 division, "core systems only". Integration patterns began changing 15 years ago. Several early attempts were made to solve the increasing problem of the widening need for integration… Enterprise Java Beans (J2EE / EJB's) attempted to make independent callable codelets. Coupling was too tight, the technology too platform specific. Remote Method Invocation (Java / RMI) attempted to make anything independently callable, but again was too platform specific and a very tightly coupled protocol. Similarly on the Microsoft side, DCOM & COM+ attempted to make anything independently and remotely callable. However, as with RMI the approach was extremely platform and vendor specific, and very tightly coupled. MQ created a reliable independent messaging paradigm, but the cost and complexity of operation made it prohibitive for most projects and all but the largest of Enterprise IT shops which could devote a focused technology...
Read more

From Spaghetti Code to Spaghetti Connections

Twenty five years ago my boss handed me the primary billing program and described a series of new features needed. The program was about 4 years old and had been worked on by 5 different programmers. It had an original design model, but between all the modifications, bug fixes, patches and quick new features thrown in, the original design pattern was impossible to discern. Any pattern was impossible to discern. It had become, to quote what’s titled the most common architecture pattern of today, ‘a big ball of mud’. After studying the program for several days, I informed my boss the program was untouchable. The effort to make anything more than a minor adjustment carried such a risk, as the impact could only be guessed at, that it was easier and less risky to rewrite it from scratch. If they had considered the future impact, they never would have let a key program degenerate that way. They would have invested the extra effort to maintain it’s design, document it property, and consider ...
Read more